Skip to content

People · 5 min · 15 October 2024

Why we turned down a 40,000-unit order

It would have been the largest single order in the company's history, and taking it would have meant shorting eleven customers who booked in the autumn.

Written by the RePallet USA yard team

Outdoor yard in bright sunshine with tall stacks of clean EPAL-stamped pallets beside a Shipping and Receiving door under a clear blue sky
OutboundBanded, counted and staged against the door. Stacks of fifteen, double-banded, the way a forklift expects them.

Talk to the yard about this

Everything on this site leads back to the same desk. If this post raised a question about your own operation, ask it here.

  • Written quotes, usually inside one business day
  • Loads from 100 pallets to full 53' trailers
  • We buy as readily as we sell — tell us which way it flows

We reply by email, so this needs to be a working address.

US or Canadian 10-digit number. Formats itself as you type.

Two-letter code or full name.

US ZIP (43217) or Canadian postal code (K1A 0B1).

Whole units, digits only.

No phone number required from us — we quote by email so you have the numbers in writing.

View into a loaded trailer stacked to the roof with wood pallets, rear doors open to blue sky

Loaded

About 330 units, two high, roughly 15,000 lb in a trailer rated for three times that. Pallet loads cube out long before they gross out.

In September we were asked to quote 40,000 units of 48×40 Grade A for delivery over eight weeks. It would have been the largest single order this company has ever taken.

We declined it, and since we have written elsewhere on this site about saying no when the answer is no, it seems reasonable to explain what that looks like in practice rather than as a slogan.

The arithmetic that decided it

Our sustained Grade A output is roughly 3,700 graded units a day. Over eight weeks, that is about 148,000 units, of which around 60% is already committed to programme customers on fixed pricing agreed the previous autumn.

That leaves roughly 59,000 uncommitted units over the period. A 40,000-unit order is 68% of the entire uncommitted capacity for two months.

It could have been done. What it could not have been done alongside is the ordinary flow of spot orders from the customers who buy two or three hundred at a time, several of whom have been doing so since 2014.

The thing about a spike

The problem with a large short-term order is not the order. It is what happens after it.

Eight weeks of running at full commitment means eight weeks of not building the inventory that carries us through spring. It means dismantling less, which starves the repair bench in Q1. It means the smaller customers who could not be served go elsewhere, discover somewhere else, and reasonably stay there.

The order would have been very good revenue for two months and a materially worse business in March.

What we offered instead

12,000 units over the period at our normal pricing, and an honest referral to two other yards in the region who could take a share of the balance.

The referral part is not altruism. This is a small trade and it has a long memory. A yard that refers work it cannot handle gets referred to; a yard that takes everything and fails to deliver gets talked about for years.

In the end the customer split the order across three suppliers including us, which was the correct outcome and probably a better one for them than a single-source arrangement at the edge of one supplier's capacity.

The general principle

Committed volume comes first. If someone booked in October at a fixed price, that stock is theirs in April whatever the spot market is doing and whatever else has been offered to us in the meantime.

That is a boring commitment and it is most of what makes a supplier relationship worth anything. Everything else on this website — the published grading standard, the diversion figures, quoting in writing — is a version of the same idea: say what you will do, then do that.

Published 15 October 2024 in People. Written by the RePallet USA yard team in Columbus, Ohio. We correct posts when they turn out to be wrong and note the change rather than quietly editing.

More from the journal

All 57 posts in the Yard Journal